GinaSmith wrote:I think binary oppositions such as straight-gay and blanket labels like bisexual to encompass the whole grey area in between are useful for simple minds, but omit to consider the infinitely versatile nature of human sexuality. As you say, you're not into men, you just like penises. I don't think this is particularly strange. Many straight guys prefer to watch porn that features a man (or at least a penis) doing a woman rather than two women together. It's not a massive leap from that to getting excited about the idea of a penis becoming aroused and ejaculating without actually being attracted to men. My own attraction to men is negligible, but the thought of the above can be quite a turn-on. I certainly wouldn't adopt a label of bisexual though. That would just be pandering to the need of simple minds to have everything neatly classified for their own comfort.
I watched a video about sexual cues a while back, and the dude explained a lot of straight people have an obsession with their own penis and others because they're most familiar with the pleasure it gives and what ticks it off. In other words, seeing someone elses penis getting sexually stimulated makes it easier to imagine yourself getting sexually stimulated. If you're not attracted to masculinity, it's unfair to call you bisexual, since fetishism that bruises the area of sexual orentiation should not be treated as absolute.