birdsong87 wrote:When you think of yourself, you wouldn't say that your symptoms are your fault. But they are your responsibilty to manage. There is a difference there.
Yes, of course. But failure to manage something that you're supposed to be responsible for--
that would be your fault.
I think that when you say "you are
responsible for your symptoms," you're running into a semantic difficulty, because the phrase "you are responsible for" is often taken to mean "you
caused" rather than "this is your responsibility to take care of." I don't know if this is perhaps specific to English, but a common phrase an adult might say to a group of kids, upon discovering a mess, or some kind of damage, is "Who's responsible for this??" meaning--"whose
fault is this?"
In the case of your mother, her symptoms aren't her fault any more than yours are, but yes, it was her responsibility to manage them in order to do her job of meeting the needs of her children. So, it can be said that her failure to do that
was her fault.
But I think I see why the fault thing kind of obscures and oversimplifies. It's limiting and does reduce things to "who's to blame?" and I agree that looking at it in terms of responsibility is helpful. Thanks.