It's one of the many things that really grates on me, how fear based a lot of, if not all of 'mainstream' Christianity is, especially here in the US. For me there's two extremes, overly religious churches and overly liberal churches. I find myself in the middle, where I believe Christians should have always been. It's really frustrating and hard to find that balance.
one thing you can always be sure of when it comes to people is that we commonly choose the extremes over the middle-ground. I guess you mean over religious by being almost cult like? I'd have to agree and same with the compromising churches. It does feel like you're alone when you are neither of those ends, but there are more people out there that believe the same, even if not as prominent.
That's fundamentalism for you. They warp verses to fit their versions of what's 'right'. They think that women should always have long hair, and only wear dresses and skirts. Because pants are too 'form fitting' and will draw mens eyes and lead them into temptation. I wish I was kidding but it's literally what is taught. If a man has 'unclean' thoughts about a woman it's never his fault but hers, for any number of stupid reasons which is usually her clothes or she was 'too forward' with him.
Hmm I think there are some movies (and tv for that matter) that do do that but I haven't been affected by it. Maybe I'm just too aware of it to be affected? I don't know.
A lot of false teachers get away with it because they don't encourage the church to read their Bibles and some people will only look as far as the preacher tells them. As God said, "My people will be destroyed for lack of knowledge." People sadly have become lazy and no longer earnest in wanting to know what God has to say and will take the easy route of not studying for themselves, praying for understanding.
Exactly. You are very aware of these things so I don't think they will have the same effect as so that blindly takes it all in without question. Most times we stop watching or listening to certain things anyway because of the the content. It's not that anyone will be punished for such things, it is more so limiting the secular influences and snares Satan creates.
That's the thing, fundamentalists are essentially teaching is that they have to be 'removed' from the world or else they'll fall into temptation and fail. They teach that the world is completely evil and to keep themselves safe they must avoid things that aren't even bad, like movies, music, tv, certain books, etc. So it's taking temptations to an extreme. It has in turn, affected me greatly because I was born into it, the teachings have been ingrained into my mind and things like churches, Bibles, certain words and certain ways a person speaks will trigger me, like someone flipped a switch in my mind and I start reverting back to old ways of thinking. It's why this scares me so much because it's had such an adverse effect on me that's still around even today, after 11 years out of it.
As Scripture says, "you are in this world, but not part of it." We are sojourners just a Jesus was and our home is in Heavenly city He has prepared. I understand what the teachings they are preaching are, but to a point. As you said, they go to extremes. That is what usually leads to those fortified places in the midwest that end up becoming cults. Since God never intended for us to live in huge numbers in one place, we see the results of that. More people leads to more sin, and thus the environment of cities. Cain was the first to build cities and Babel was another city where the results of sin could be seen. All over the Bible we find cities lead to what could be avoided in rural living. That does not mean everything about a city is bad, mind you. But the luxuries of them come at a prices. A lot of people try and leave the cities but cannot afford to.
The only time I know of that the Bible says we are to abandon the world altogether is just before Jesus arrival because persecution would begin.
Do you think it is hard for you to separate what is true from the extremes that you have been taught? You might have said that several times, but specifically, I think your saying that your mind automatically goes to what you have been taught instead of that middle ground or new understanding that comes to you.
It seems like their forged your perception of God through themselves. What they did, God approved of. I can understand how that is impossible seemingly to differentiate, but I think you are breaking through that.
I have to disagree there. What I've learned from researching losing ones salvation is that it's not possible. Salvation is gained through faith alone. I'm quotingthis website here about it,
I read through your link and thanks for letting me see where that perspective was coming from. One glaring thing stood out most when I came to the end of it.
When Saul went to the witch of Endor. If you remember the story, the witches, deviators and mediums had been banished from the land because they practiced paganism and it was not of God. This leads into what I was talking about when I said we don't go to Heaven when we die. It comes down to our understanding of what is a soul. The Bible says a living soul is comprised of the dust of the earth and breath of life, which comes from God. When we die, the body decays and the breath returns to God, presumably until the Second Coming and the dead in Christ rise first, followed by those alive. If we think the spirit is a separate entity, then that leads to believing that Samuel did indeed was summoned by the witch.
A soul is not immortal because we are told:
Revelation 20:5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
John 5:28- "Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice.
The contradiction should stand out: Does God work through witches, which He condemns? Remember that the spirit that looked like Samuel lied to Saul and led him and his son, Jonathan to their death. It was a demon summoned by a witch, only Jesus has power to bring back the dead, not man. I think the translation of "spirit" in that passage in the Ancient Hebrew is the same word used for an unclean spirit or demon. Saul's final rejection of God was trusting in enchanters rather than God. Losing salvation is not God removing it, it is our own willful rejection of God that is the reason we lose salvation. Faith is required for salvation, but what faith did Saul have at that point? To be saved is to trust in God and follow His ways, but Saul did none of these. Saul did not repent or ask for forgiveness. When David committed a double-sin, he truthfully repented. That is the difference of faith and salvation and losing one's way. Our actions show which way we walk.
Otherwise that just means anyone can be baptized, say they are saved and sin believing they are in God's favour.
I hope that wasn't confusing. Even if you still disagree, no problem

I don't expect you to take my word and a few verses as salt when you can study in-depth when you are curious on the matter. I'm trying to avoid sounding preachy as possible ^_^
Galatians 2:15-21
15 “We who are Jews by birth and not sinful Gentiles 16 know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in[a] Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified.
17 “But if, in seeking to be justified in Christ, we Jews find ourselves also among the sinners, doesn’t that mean that Christ promotes sin? Absolutely not! 18 If I rebuild what I destroyed, then I really would be a lawbreaker.
19 “For through the law I died to the law so that I might live for God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!
*Just in case, I'll mention this because some preach this to people. When it says Jews, it does not mean the hereditary ones. Remember the Paul preached to a church of Jews and Gentiles. Gentiles are spiritual Jews because they were accepted into the family through Christ's sacrifice because salvation was for all.
You are right in one sense. The first covenant, which was man justifying himself through the law did not work. Obeying the law alone does not save us. Faith is required. However, Paul also says that it was through recognizing the law, that he died to it and lived through faith. If you noticed verse 17, it says that we are not justified by Christ alone, because a sinner that is saved is no longer justified by faith. His heart is not with God, but that is what repentance is for. We ask for forgiveness. Why would we need prayer to repent if we are saved? It through recognizing the law of God that we are no longer under the penalty of the law (which is death), but we are under grace, and we walk in faith with Christ.
God actually painted a picture of the three steps of salvation: Remember the tabernacles 3 compartments? Outside was the altar of sacrifice; that is called Justification. It represents Christ's sacrifice. We are justified through Him. Then there is the Holy place with the candles (spreading the light of truth), the bread (the Bible), and the altar of incense (representing prayer). That's called Sanctification. Then there is the Holy of Holy room, where God resided. It represented Glorification. God built a model of how steps to salvation, so we are the ones confused when He left every opportunity to understand Him available.
Well I know that are used to the modern use of "fundamentalist" so it will sound wrong to you. As I said, fundamentalist never meant what it has become today. Let's put it this way if easier to relate: The Protestant Reformation began because the Catholic church said they alone determined what the Bible meant. The reformers believed the Bible answered itself, that God told us what we need to know through Scripture. That does not mean it was the only thing we should trust because many can be inspired by the Holy Spirit to write or teach something that harmonizes with Scripture and we can learn from that too.
Fundamentalism now means what the Protestants called fanaticism or extremism. That is what you grew up with but recognize as fundamentalist teachings. Current politics and Catholicism (who believe the Bible should not be taken seriously/literally at all) have twisted the term to describe terrorists, furthering the bad connotation. You would agree because it does represent extremist views, but there are those that are not extremist and believe in the Bible, (no traditions above it, but coinciding) consider themselves fundamentalist in the original definition. If you have read Revelation, it says that God's Word will be trampled upon aka those that do not adhere to what will be enforced because of adherence to the Bible. I don't want to say too much more on what that is leading up to, because it's a whole other discussion. XP
You're very welcome and thank you for sharing and responding yourself. I wish you the best and hope you have a wonderful day