| Psychology and Mental Health Forum | |
https://www.psychforums.com/blog/highdimensionman/index_sid-9583bcc14dbc517af89257df03f4ef5a_start-1020.html |
|
| Author: | highdimensionman [ Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:23 pm ] |
| Blog Subject: | Are hospitals a bad place for an epidemic |
Imagine your in a less astute hospital or not very clean hospital ward. some guy perfectly healthy has a rash and is acting like a bit of a hypochondriac worry about his rash. so the nurse goes up to the guy and pokes his rash saying don't worry there's nothing to worry about. then with out cleaning her hands she touches some very sick old women to move her around. this women gets the rash. seeing how the healthy patent is nearly recovered from the rash she thinks there's nothing to worry about but because the patient has such a poor immune system the rash strengthens. by the time they realize they need to use anti biotics on the patient the rash has spread to loads more people some of whome are very sick as well. its becoming a problem now even the healthy patients are needing antibiotics but not all of them however to be on the safe side they treat all of them with antibiotics. then with one of the very sick patients the rash starts to become resistant so they use more of the antibiotic and so it gets worse. Ok here's a hypothetical suggestion say your now in a poor country in a not very knowledgeable hospital and bat hunting has gotten popular as a delicacy and more than people then usual have gotten bitten spreading say some sort of dodgy infection that can get passed from touching body fluids. A few people die and a few live then you send them home and although the patients feel better they can still transmit the virus. before you know it 20 people have the virus in the same hospital and 12 have gotten it outside of the hospital. then an unequipped aid worker comes into to help and doesn't really know how to manage the issue but he calls for the people effected to be persuaded back to the hospital. in the hospital the people with good immunity mix with the people with poor immunity and the death rate increases. by the time well equipped people arrive its a major epidemic. How could this have been dealt with better? Not to mention a company seizing the opportunity to try a genetically modified product untested on patients which upsets the communities paranoia further. this disease by the causes thinning of the blood headaches and such. Personally if i contracted to disease I would eat lemons to stop the sickness, very rich food to reclot the blood and take arginine maybe agmatine to be able to better naturally manage the headaches. how ever they in this situation don't see diet as being of much relevance and use blood thinning pain killers when the lack morphine and an untested genetically modified product and even offer the patients cows milk products which enhances the diorrea. opps actually its not hypothetical say hello to ebola it may not have have happened exactly as im saying but its an issue and you could be next in a worst case scenario. |
|
| Author: | highdimensionman [ Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:54 pm ] |
| Blog Subject: | The road to factorizing integers fast. |
As you may know practically all security on the internet relies on the fact that it is hard to factorise composite numbers made up of large primes. Recently in some of my research regarding r-simplex's and prime numbers I discovered that a number N is a prime if TN(TN(N,N),5)/N is equal to an integer as far as I have tested this is not true for any composite number. Although this is probably the slowest method known to man for finding if a number is a prime or not because TN(N,N) = pochhammer(N,N)/N! which takes a lot of ever more computing power to calculate the bigger the Value of N it does however demonstrate a direct relationship between Pn and the triangle numbers. Armed with knowledge of this special relationship something I had suspected for a long time but had never proven which I still have not actually developed a proof for but simply have tested I decided to search for a quick method. I later discvovered that using a modulation of the polygonal numbers I could generate a good chance of making a Prime. My modulation of the polygonal numbers works like this for a polygonal number with 3 sides you get the pattern {1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4.....} and for a polygonal number with 4 sides you get the pattern {1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7....} and so on. This showed me there was a link between the polygonal numbers and the prime numbers. Then with my research regarding R-Simplex's I decided to try and make use of the Jacobi symbol which I had found people used in many probable prime tests I found that the Jacobi symbol works fast with very large numbers so it ideal. I then ran into the problem that the Jacobi symbol only produces a 1 a 0 or a -1 . In order to capitalise on this I decided to modulate my polygonal modulation and came up with this. an example of this new function is Polyxmod(n,3,2) (3 being the number of sides 2 being the modulation depth) anyway this gives you the pattern {1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3....}. Altogether I have now found a way to deduce at least most oif the primes maybe ending up with a few composites using a function combining all of the functions. guess(n) = {Denominator(TN(n,4)/(Polyxmod(n,5,4)-jacobisymbol(n,4)+1), Polyxmod(n,5,4)-jacobisymbol(n,5)} then by doing some tests on this function I get these useful tests. tests(n) = {guess(2^1*n^2),guess(2^3*n^2),guess(2^5*n^2)},{guess(2^1*n^3),guess(2^3,n^3),guess(2^5*n^3)},{guess(5^1*n^2),guess(5^3*n^2),guess(5^5*n^2)},{guess(5^1*n^3),guess(5^3*n^3),guess(5^5*n^3)},{guess(11*n),guess(11^2*n),guess(11^3*n)}. . I know my analysis is not perfect but its getting me closer than I've ever been and if I can get it to correctly question if a number is a prime or not I think I know how to go about working out how to do factorisation by counting the occourences of integers in polyxmod(n5,5) |
|
| Author: | highdimensionman [ Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:36 am ] |
| Blog Subject: | Circles and Cantor. |
You may know that Cantor challenged the mind of god. you might be lead to believe that a decimal has more infinite possibilities than counting 1 to infinity in integer form. This is true if you count all the decimals in between the integers whilst counting up to infinity. However if you count all the decimal numbers between 0 and 1 starting with the smallest 0.00...to infinity with a 1 at the end then remove the 0. bit from the beginning you end up starting with 1 and end up counting to infinity just as you would when you count integers from 1 to infinity if you keep the zeros at the end and remove the zeros before your counted number. in terms of geometry were dealing with effectively an imaginary 1 dimensional circle to best represent this. When your side length is above 0 and below 1 you end up with a Integer between 1 and infinity. So for example 0.0000.... to infinity with a one at the end simply equals an imaginary 1d circle size of 1. When your side length is 1 your circle size is the integer infinity. Are you with me so far I'll bet not but what I'm saying isn't contradictory. here comes the wired bit by this logic the 1d circle area at integer infinity is infinity to the power of infinity. A normal 2D circle also has and area inclusive in its size the imaginary 1d was the equivillent to just a circumference. In the case of 2D counting wise you have to count with two numbers for every value to fully represent it dynamics and so on and so forth up to infinite dimension. So if you had an infinite set of numbers representing an infinite side length you would end up with infinity to the power of infinity as your hyper volume or size. If you then deduce each value of your infinity with with another same infinity of values system then deduce each of those values again with the same system and do this to infinity you end up with all your setting values at 0.000 to infinity with a 1 at the end and representing an infinity to the power of infinity to the power of infinity... all the way to infinity. It is at this point you achieve super infinity an infinity encompassing all infinities. |
|
| Author: | highdimensionman [ Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:02 pm ] |
| Blog Subject: | Getting to space without the need of a rocket. |
The golden rule here is to cheat any way we can. We can make use of ground energy satalite collected energy and space energy in general. Let's work on both material strength and metameterial dynamics with our big bucks. We only need enough ability to carry one human in a capsule. Instead of using elevator technology let's use beads and disks as our spine. Let's seek to hover or blast our way up with the energy of the spine. I was reading in new scientist the other week how scientists have made a magnet that only has one polarity we've got 15 - 40 years to go yet unless there's a better way all I hear from governments and business over space is a lot of promises very little substance. We don't even need as much effort as the concept above to get nanotechnology up and collaberating in space without rockets. |
|
| Author: | highdimensionman [ Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:37 am ] |
| Blog Subject: | The road toward a digital quantum analoptic computer |
Analogue equivilence . Because we live in a proportionate dip in the universe we can test how equivalent our digital chips are to the full analogue system/computation that the digital uses of the analouge . The more we can maintain Turing completeness and at the same time get closer to the analogue equivalence the deeper our understanding of physics has to be to archive it. Qbits quantum computing is like searching a 10000 variables at once so far the level of disruption in the quantum aspect has proven to be an obstical to poerfoirmance. qbits which the quantum computer works with are spin chirality reprensatation so spinning left is 0 and spinning right is 1 and the qbit is seen as in a state of 1and0 but. The problem is really the system is not in a state of 1 and 0 its spin state is merely undeterminable with current research techniques. |
|
| All times are UTC | |
Powered by phpBB © 2002, 2006 phpBB Group www.phpbb.com |
|