Hey Santa Fe and others.
First of all I domt discount freud completely. I only believe though about certain aspects he was disturbed therefore projected that onto others. So others began to believe it so then others began to agree therefore not really doing there own fresh unbiased research but with his views in the back of their minds. Almost always in the background of any psychologist in history, they had something disturbing that happened to them in their background. It is the REASON they go into psychology in the first place even when their own hauntings have not been resolved but they feel the urge to help people and figure them out to help them therefore helping themselves.
Just like evolution it is a THEORY that can never be proven. It isn't solid as in math with 2 plu 2 equaling 4. Even if people from the beginning of time to the end of time have that theory it cannot be proven scientifically. It still remain just a theory.
BUT I do agree with rescued that freud has some valid points and I agree that a person could be predisposed somehow to HPD perhaps at the dysunction while being carried byu the mother. Then the environmental factors ultimately decide if that person will have HPD. And the situation talked anout that the woman still ended up with HPD even though the father was no where around helps our theory that it is caused by lack od bonding or emotional abandonment of the mother. And tattereds wife's father died when she was young I think he said so this also backs up the theory.
Prmiscuity is a separate isse that arrises when the father is absent from the picture. So we could analize that another time.
Either way so far no HPDs that have spoke up on this board since I joined have said no, I had a wonderful doting mother who never abandoned me. So we are more than likely all right in our own views that the mother is the key in the HPD factor.





News