Mr. No One wrote:There is another variable in this regard. The fact that you don't read other people's post as thorough as you
ought. For if you did you would realize that I was referring to the fact that the "OP" did not have the people
around him/her under their control. And therefore they were thinking about kicking him out instead of helping
him/her out. Obviously, people are erratic in their behavior and that is why sometimes they need a little
help in the right direction. They would want to help him if he/she rearranged the situation for that to come
Yes, and you missed my point where i tried to point out that; Many people are not the tools you think they are and you can control a tool for so long until they man up to you and kick you out. Thats why one targets weak people in the first place isnt it? He provided no information on this what so ever, so you are only making assumptions based on nothing.
Mr. No One wrote:Well, I am not one to go by the book when it comes to "AsPD." I think I have proven this is various other posts. But I do think that there might be some merit to there being two different kinds of "anti-social" personality. I'm
opened minded like that in certain instances. LOL As for your question of Mr. Kemper, why could not he be a
sociopath instead of a psychopath? The reason I use "broken" data as you refer to it, is the fact that I disagree
with the "good" doctors when speaking about this particular subject. This broken data is my own opinion, which
I consider myself an expert because supposedly I am a diagnosed "anti-social." There is so much unknown about
this disorder because there is not a huge amount of data. It hasn't been as fully studied as much as other mental
illnesses and disorder.
I think its a good thing that you don't go by the book, but you cant simply disregard stuff you dont like
because you believe you're an expert. Typical way of thinking for deluted(religious etc) people if you didnt know.
However, in my book psychopathy(aspd) is just a word made to describe a certain "type" of people. The criterias for either Aspd or the psychopatic checklist are many and varies from person to person. Some may be disorgaanised, some are stupid, some are gay and some are sadistic to the degree that they hunt and kill other people for fun. Remember this is not people you see on TV. Real life is more complex. You don't seem to realise that you make two distinctions based on something that is not that
relevant to the traits that is the reason for the label in the first place. Im not claiming to be an expert here but according to you we have two hardcore predators but we cant give them the same label because one sits on his lazy ass while the other does sports. Its just a silly way of thinking.
Mr. No One wrote:By the way, I don't think the mods are really worried about you "giving me a hard time." LOL You are going to have to do alot better than that to "upset" me. LOL Your opinion of me and my intelligence is of no importance
to anyone other than yourself. So if you feel better after doing what you do, that is great and I hope it works
out for you. Carry on. LOL
My post to you is not hostile but its not exactly nice either ill admit. I often come off as bad even though i dont mean to. Ive gotten a few warnings lately(where my opinion of it does not matter) and im simply trying to evade being "muted" because i "nitpick". If im going down for innocent #######4 im taking you with me.